<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for tnypxl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.atinypixel.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.atinypixel.com</link>
	<description>Making the web better, one tiny pixel at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:18:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Designing for the Web in Photoshop Sucks by Elvenrunelord</title>
		<link>http://blog.atinypixel.com/2010/01/why-designing-in-photoshop-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Elvenrunelord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atinypixel.com/?p=301#comment-60</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i hate that photoshop is so counter intuitive. Every time i go to do something the way it makes sense to me...the selection is blacked out or i get a box saying you can&#039;t do that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;yes photoshop is awesome in what it can do, but doing it is nothing less a big pain in the arse and having to learn a new language.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Artist should be able to using photoshop to do art like an artist would....not like a programmer would!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hate that photoshop is so counter intuitive. Every time i go to do something the way it makes sense to me&#8230;the selection is blacked out or i get a box saying you can&#8217;t do that.</p>

<p>yes photoshop is awesome in what it can do, but doing it is nothing less a big pain in the arse and having to learn a new language.</p>

<p>Artist should be able to using photoshop to do art like an artist would&#8230;.not like a programmer would!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Things Your Users Don&#8217;t Care to Hear by Arik</title>
		<link>http://blog.atinypixel.com/2010/01/5-things-your-users-dont-care-to-hear/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Arik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atinypixel.com/2010/01/5-things-your-users-dont-care-to-hear/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Inspiration knows no bounds!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inspiration knows no bounds!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Designing for the Web in Photoshop Sucks by Arik</title>
		<link>http://blog.atinypixel.com/2010/01/why-designing-in-photoshop-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Arik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atinypixel.com/?p=301#comment-57</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well essentially yes. While the process hasn&#039;t been that successful for me while under the gun, I find it to be freeing when I&#039;m not under deadline. But this year I&#039;m hoping to improve on the process so that I can do it fast and that means pre-writing a bunch of stuff.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well essentially yes. While the process hasn&#8217;t been that successful for me while under the gun, I find it to be freeing when I&#8217;m not under deadline. But this year I&#8217;m hoping to improve on the process so that I can do it fast and that means pre-writing a bunch of stuff.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Designing for the Web in Photoshop Sucks by 3rd Corner Studios</title>
		<link>http://blog.atinypixel.com/2010/01/why-designing-in-photoshop-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>3rd Corner Studios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atinypixel.com/?p=301#comment-56</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can make a PSD 100% the same in Firefox. While there will be discrepencies like font pixelation and smoothing (like on older macs everything looks bold), but if iwanted to spend the extra 20 hours to make it look perfect for each browser out there, it&#039;s possible.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree with your post however, and I&#039;ve sort of regressed back to the layout sketching on a whiteboard or notebook. Soooooo much better! Then take it into a wireframe software app like you mentioned, let the client see an idea come to life. Rather than wait 3 months for 50 PSDs of each page. Have you ever had like 200 elements in your design and moving things around gets messy?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I used Fireworks for a while because of the interactive states you can create and the easy vector tools and web sets, but it&#039;s a resource hog and the process of saving images to the web was tedious. I now use a blend:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Visualize.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Notebook / Whiteboard.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Wireframe &amp; Fireworks.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Touchup w Photoshop and create Media rich elements (maybe some Flash too).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;THEN I got to HTML and CSS.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What you&#039;re saying is start with the HTML and CSS? I&#039;ve never tried that before....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can make a PSD 100% the same in Firefox. While there will be discrepencies like font pixelation and smoothing (like on older macs everything looks bold), but if iwanted to spend the extra 20 hours to make it look perfect for each browser out there, it&#8217;s possible.</p>

<p>I agree with your post however, and I&#8217;ve sort of regressed back to the layout sketching on a whiteboard or notebook. Soooooo much better! Then take it into a wireframe software app like you mentioned, let the client see an idea come to life. Rather than wait 3 months for 50 PSDs of each page. Have you ever had like 200 elements in your design and moving things around gets messy?</p>

<p>I used Fireworks for a while because of the interactive states you can create and the easy vector tools and web sets, but it&#8217;s a resource hog and the process of saving images to the web was tedious. I now use a blend:</p>

<ul>
<li>Visualize.</li>
<li>Notebook / Whiteboard.</li>
<li>Wireframe &amp; Fireworks.</li>
<li>Touchup w Photoshop and create Media rich elements (maybe some Flash too).</li>
<li>THEN I got to HTML and CSS.</li>
</ul>

<p>What you&#8217;re saying is start with the HTML and CSS? I&#8217;ve never tried that before&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Designing for the Web in Photoshop Sucks by Arik</title>
		<link>http://blog.atinypixel.com/2010/01/why-designing-in-photoshop-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Arik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atinypixel.com/?p=301#comment-58</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Jeremy,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Usefulness is relative. So I’ll just ignore that. But I am sorry that you disagree. This post is clearly not a write-up on alternatives to Photoshop. If it were, I would have titled this post, “Alternatives to Photoshop”. As a matter of fact, this post is more about design process than about tools and maybe that wasn’t communicated effectively. For that I apologize.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But if you want options, try a pencil and paper. That’s worked well for me on many occasions. If you’re showing to clients, use Visio or OmniGraffle which are both great for wire-framing and allow you to add super basic interaction bits like submitting a form, clicking a button/link or moving between pages. Not to mention there are tons of resources for designing web layouts with those tools.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The whole point of the post was to suggest that the final product shouldn’t be in Photoshop. That is not where a design should end and for me, that’s not where I want it to start either. Every design decision you make in photoshop is an arbitrary guess at how it will look in the browser. You can get really close and for some that’s good enough. For others it may not be. It’s really up to you what you should use because everyone’s process is different. It’s all about the best tool for the job in relation to your own process.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeremy,</p>

<p>Usefulness is relative. So I’ll just ignore that. But I am sorry that you disagree. This post is clearly not a write-up on alternatives to Photoshop. If it were, I would have titled this post, “Alternatives to Photoshop”. As a matter of fact, this post is more about design process than about tools and maybe that wasn’t communicated effectively. For that I apologize.</p>

<p>But if you want options, try a pencil and paper. That’s worked well for me on many occasions. If you’re showing to clients, use Visio or OmniGraffle which are both great for wire-framing and allow you to add super basic interaction bits like submitting a form, clicking a button/link or moving between pages. Not to mention there are tons of resources for designing web layouts with those tools.</p>

<p>The whole point of the post was to suggest that the final product shouldn’t be in Photoshop. That is not where a design should end and for me, that’s not where I want it to start either. Every design decision you make in photoshop is an arbitrary guess at how it will look in the browser. You can get really close and for some that’s good enough. For others it may not be. It’s really up to you what you should use because everyone’s process is different. It’s all about the best tool for the job in relation to your own process.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Designing for the Web in Photoshop Sucks by Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://blog.atinypixel.com/2010/01/why-designing-in-photoshop-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atinypixel.com/?p=301#comment-54</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I love it when people complain like this but don&#039;t offer an alternate solution. Great, you hate Photoshop and list why its bad for devs. Ok, then what are my other options? This article is pointless and not useful unless you are targeting Adobe hoping they read it and make Photoshop more developer friendly.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it when people complain like this but don&#8217;t offer an alternate solution. Great, you hate Photoshop and list why its bad for devs. Ok, then what are my other options? This article is pointless and not useful unless you are targeting Adobe hoping they read it and make Photoshop more developer friendly.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Things Your Users Don&#8217;t Care to Hear by RyanMacG</title>
		<link>http://blog.atinypixel.com/2010/01/5-things-your-users-dont-care-to-hear/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>RyanMacG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atinypixel.com/2010/01/5-things-your-users-dont-care-to-hear/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Number 3 sounds an awful lot like a certain BlackBerry twitter app dev team...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 3 sounds an awful lot like a certain BlackBerry twitter app dev team&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designer on Rails: RJS by Miles</title>
		<link>http://blog.atinypixel.com/2009/05/designer-on-rails-rjs/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atinypixel.com/?p=22#comment-50</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;While I understand this is a terribly old post to be commenting on, I feel that I must chime in here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree wholeheartedly with Arik. I feel that developers have enough issues with browser inconsistency, and other actual issues to be worrying about javascript possibly being turned off in 0.5% of browsers. Even the iPhone which has gained so much traction in the recent months (along with Android) have the ability to work with javascript.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While not a completely moot point, I think the &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I understand this is a terribly old post to be commenting on, I feel that I must chime in here.</p>

<p>I agree wholeheartedly with Arik. I feel that developers have enough issues with browser inconsistency, and other actual issues to be worrying about javascript possibly being turned off in 0.5% of browsers. Even the iPhone which has gained so much traction in the recent months (along with Android) have the ability to work with javascript.</p>

<p>While not a completely moot point, I think the </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Life without Cable TV by Blaine Garrett</title>
		<link>http://blog.atinypixel.com/2009/10/life-without-cable-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaine Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atinypixel.com/2009/10/life-without-cable-tv/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have not personally had TV since I was living at my parents&#92;&#039; in highschool. For a long time, I just had better things to do (studying, art, etc). I suppose it helped that we didn&#92;&#039;t have cable growing up, and thus didn&#92;&#039;t miss not having it. I did feel a bit left out not knowing all the latest pop culture BS as it related to TV, but now we have Hulu and netflix streaming, so I still seem to be able to catch what I want. 
It is somewhat funny to go to the gym where they have a wall of tvs in front of the treadmills and see the lame crap people tune them to. Perhaps it is just the times I go, but it is always either CSI, Law and Order, some bs on E!, or cooking shows. I realize you are not going to go to the gym and watch a movie, but I am guessing the people who take the time to change the channel to these programs have cable at home too and thus are continuing their regular viewing habits. It is is a weird world.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Congrats on ditching cable. I&#92;&#039;m guessing you will enjoy life quite a bit more, even if you have less mundane trivia to spout that is the usual fare when you get a handful of people together in a room. hehe.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not personally had TV since I was living at my parents&#92;&#8217; in highschool. For a long time, I just had better things to do (studying, art, etc). I suppose it helped that we didn&#92;&#8217;t have cable growing up, and thus didn&#92;&#8217;t miss not having it. I did feel a bit left out not knowing all the latest pop culture BS as it related to TV, but now we have Hulu and netflix streaming, so I still seem to be able to catch what I want. 
It is somewhat funny to go to the gym where they have a wall of tvs in front of the treadmills and see the lame crap people tune them to. Perhaps it is just the times I go, but it is always either CSI, Law and Order, some bs on E!, or cooking shows. I realize you are not going to go to the gym and watch a movie, but I am guessing the people who take the time to change the channel to these programs have cable at home too and thus are continuing their regular viewing habits. It is is a weird world.</p>

<p>Congrats on ditching cable. I&#92;&#8217;m guessing you will enjoy life quite a bit more, even if you have less mundane trivia to spout that is the usual fare when you get a handful of people together in a room. hehe.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ebert is an Elitest Douche Bag by Thomas</title>
		<link>http://blog.atinypixel.com/2009/06/ebert-is-an-elitest-douche-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atinypixel.com/?p=140#comment-47</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The movie SUCKED! Waste of time and money.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movie SUCKED! Waste of time and money.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
